About this page
Once a week or so* I run a script to collect information about newly available public documents on eCCB. I store that information in a SQLite database that you can download from Github if you want to run your own queries. Because the information is collected by a script and mostly not checked by a human, I can't guarantee that it's 100% accurate. It should be pretty close, and more accurate than what I was capturing with the old scripts (e.g. if two reasons are found in a dismissal order, both are now collected). I've been watching CCB data since the CCB was a few months old, and I've tried to make sure the script accounts for a variety of rare occurrences and edge cases. I also have it prompt for human input when the data it grabs is hard to interpret.
This page collects the results of some of the queries I thought would be most interesting. You can contact me (Katie Fortney) at bibliobaloney@duck.com if you have questions about other queries. I use that address for this project because while it combines my interest in copyright with my programming hobby, it's not particularly related to the work that I do for the University of California.
If you're looking for the CCB info that used to be here, it's been archived and will no longer be updated. If you want to skim or search what claimants are writing in their claims, you can download a file that incudes that language for: Infringement claims (.csv); Noninfringement claims (.csv); or DMCA misrepresentation claims (.csv).
*I'll be out on vacation in late April/early May and not updating anything during that time.
Page last updated 2024-04-24
Final Determinations
Per the CCB website, "A CCB proceeding becomes 'active' after the claimant has filed proof of service with the CCB, and the respondent ... has not opted out within the required time (usually sixty days). ... After parties have submitted their written testimony and any hearings have been held, the CCB will issue its final determination."
Final determinations issued: 23
Docket Number | Caption | Determination type | Damages | Claimant represented? | Date | Case duration (days) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22-CCB-0058 | Shocked v. Billington | Final Determination | 0 | No | 2024-04-03 | 628 |
23-CCB-0035 | Comedy Spotlight Productions, Inc. v. Store on Sunset LLC, et al | Final Determination | 0 | Yes | 2024-03-08 | 408 |
22-CCB-0183 | Schirmacher v. Allora Medical Spa | Default | 7000 | Yes | 2024-02-16 | 504 |
22-CCB-0255 | Hirsch v. Southern Chinese Daily News, LLC | Default | 3600 | Yes | 2024-02-14 | 440 |
22-CCB-0263 | Shocked v. McInnes | Final Determination | 750 | No | 2024-02-08 | 423 |
22-CCB-0046 | Oakes v. Heart of Gold Pageant System Inc., et al | Default | 4500 | Yes | 2024-01-24 | 566 |
23-CCB-0071 | Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dawson, et al | Default | 0 | Yes | 2024-01-02 | 321 |
22-CCB-0008 | Corjulo v. Mandrell | Final Determination | 2250 | No | 2023-12-14 | 546 |
22-CCB-0012 | Bronner v. EssayZoo | Default | 1200 | No | 2023-11-20 | 522 |
23-CCB-0172 | Kenna Sato Designs, LLC v. Lisitsa | Settlement | 300 | Yes | 2023-11-14 | 182 |
22-CCB-0005 | Dermansky v. Rule 62, Inc. | Default | 1350 | Yes | 2023-11-01 | 503 |
22-CCB-0137 | Urbanlip.com Ltd v. Faviana International Inc | Default | 2600 | Yes | 2023-11-01 | 427 |
22-CCB-0112 | Paramount Pictures Corporation v. JMC POP UPS LLC | Settlement | No information provided | Yes | 2023-10-23 | 425 |
22-CCB-0251 | Pinwheel Crafts LLC v. Pettit | Settlement | 0 | No | 2023-10-19 | 322 |
22-CCB-0100 | Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Village Restaurant LLC d/b/a Indian Village Restaurant & Lounge, et al | Default | 3300 | Yes | 2023-10-04 | 418 |
22-CCB-0098 | Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Arif Skyline Cafe LLC, et al | Default | 3000 | Yes | 2023-09-22 | 407 |
22-CCB-0219 | Hursey v. Hakimian Global LLC | Default | 3000 | No | 2023-09-22 | 329 |
22-CCB-0163 | Hursey v. QUINNEY | Default | 3000 | No | 2023-08-31 | 343 |
22-CCB-0056 | Hursey v. Lavaca LLC | Default | 3000 | No | 2023-08-24 | 405 |
22-CCB-0269 | ARMATUS DEALER UPLIFT, LLC v. Wooden Automotive Consultants LLC | Settlement | 9000 | Yes | 2023-07-05 | 202 |
22-CCB-0072 | Scott Douglas Ora, individually, and in his derivative capacity as trustee of the Leo Robin Trust, on behalf of the Leo Robin Trust v. Warner Chappell Music | Dismissal | 0 | No | 2023-06-27 | 335 |
22-CCB-0045 | Oppenheimer v. Prutton | Final Determination | 1000 | Yes | 2023-02-28 | 236 |
22-CCB-0035 | Flores v. Mitrakos | Settlement | 0 | No | 2023-02-15 | 232 |
Active Cases
Per the CCB website, "A CCB proceeding becomes 'active' after the claimant has filed proof of service with the CCB, and the respondent ... has not opted out within the required time (usually sixty days)." Once a final determination is issued, a case is no longer active.
Number of active claims as of 2024-04-24: 37
For these active cases, average number of days since the earliest available claim was filed (as of 2024-04-24): 179
Types of claims
Claim type | Cases |
---|---|
Infringement | 35 |
DMCA Misrepresentation | 2 |
Potential for default
Is there anything on the docket that was filed by a respondent (not a claimant or the CCB)?
Any filings by respondent? | Cases |
---|---|
Yes | 20 |
No | 17 |
Representation
What percent of the claims were filed by claimants with attorneys?
This information is pulled from the earliest publicly available claim filed in a case, and is only available when a claim is publicly available.
Currently active cases
41% of claims had claimants with representation.
0 claims had multiple law firms representing claimants.
Law firm | Cases |
---|---|
No law firm | 22 |
The Law Firm of Higbee and Associates | 3 |
Burns the Attorney, Inc. | 1 |
Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC | 1 |
Higbee & Associates | 1 |
Ice Miller LLP | 1 |
Leichtman Law PLLC | 1 |
Axenfeld Law Group, LLC | 1 |
Evans & Dixon | 1 |
The Brickell IP Group, PLLC | 1 |
Law Office of Elizabeth T Russell LLC | 1 |
Driscoll & Seltzer, PLLC | 1 |
H. Roske & Associates LLP | 1 |
TBillick Law PLLC | 1 |
Active plus formerly active
76% of claims had claimants with representation.
0 claims had multiple law firms representing claimants.
Law firm | Cases |
---|---|
No law firm | 32 |
The Law Firm of Higbee and Associates | 5 |
Higbee & Associates | 3 |
Jekielek & Janis | 3 |
Leichtman Law PLLC | 2 |
Ice Miller LLP | 1 |
H. Roske & Associates LLP | 1 |
Driscoll & Seltzer, PLLC | 1 |
Law Office of Elizabeth T Russell LLC | 1 |
The Brickell IP Group, PLLC | 1 |
Evans & Dixon | 1 |
Axenfeld Law Group, LLC | 1 |
Burns the Attorney, Inc. | 1 |
Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC | 1 |
Cognition IP, P.C. | 1 |
L/O Lawrence G Townsene | 1 |
Law Office of Steven Wrobel LLC | 1 |
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP | 1 |
Gurr Brande & Spendlove, PLLC | 1 |
TBillick Law PLLC | 1 |
All cases filed
25% of claims (where the claim is available) had claimants with representation.
(See All Cases below for more information about all claims.)
Open Cases
Cases that have not yet reached the active phase, but also have not yet been dismissed/closed. For an overview of the steps between a claim filing and becoming active, see this flowchart at the CCB website.
Current status
Status | Cases |
---|---|
Waiting for Amended Claim | 39 |
Waiting for Proof of Service | 39 |
Waiting for Scheduling Order/Expiration of Opt Out Window | 34 |
Waiting for Initial Review | 11 |
Waiting for Review of Amended Claim | 6 |
In Abeyance | 2 |
Historical status numbers
Dismissed Cases
Reasons for dismissal
Totals may be more than the total number of dismissal orders because a few orders include two reasons, e.g. bad faith and failure to amend.
A few claims have been dismissed as the result of a settlement with the condition that they are initially without prejudice but will become dismissals with prejudice if the claimant does not file a new claim within a certain period of time. I have abbreviated this as "Settlement; prejudice pending."
There's also a pie chart for the reasons across all dismissals so far.
All dismissals
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Failure to amend | 264 |
Proof of service not filed | 115 |
Respondent(s) opted out | 72 |
Request from claimant | 67 |
3 tries and still noncompliant | 37 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 32 |
Copyright registration refused by Copyright Office | 14 |
Bad-faith conduct | 9 |
Service was not valid | 8 |
Failure to provide respondent address | 8 |
Settlement; dismissed without prejudice | 5 |
Settlement; prejudice pending | 3 |
Foreign respondent; no bad faith found | 3 |
Payment for the claim failed | 2 |
Second filing fee not paid | 1 |
Copyright registration application abandoned | 1 |
Represented claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Proof of service not filed | 37 |
Respondent(s) opted out | 24 |
Request from claimant | 23 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 20 |
Failure to amend | 18 |
Settlement; dismissed without prejudice | 4 |
3 tries and still noncompliant | 2 |
Settlement; prejudice pending | 2 |
Copyright registration refused by Copyright Office | 1 |
Bad-faith conduct | 1 |
Unrepresented claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Failure to amend | 246 |
Proof of service not filed | 78 |
Respondent(s) opted out | 48 |
Request from claimant | 44 |
3 tries and still noncompliant | 35 |
Copyright registration refused by Copyright Office | 13 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 12 |
Bad-faith conduct | 8 |
Service was not valid | 8 |
Failure to provide respondent address | 8 |
Foreign respondent; no bad faith found | 3 |
Payment for the claim failed | 2 |
Second filing fee not paid | 1 |
Settlement; dismissed without prejudice | 1 |
Copyright registration application abandoned | 1 |
Settlement; prejudice pending | 1 |
Past 30 days - all claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Failure to amend | 23 |
Request from claimant | 5 |
Proof of service not filed | 4 |
3 tries and still noncompliant | 3 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 3 |
Bad-faith conduct | 1 |
Past 30 days - represented claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Request from claimant | 2 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 2 |
Failure to amend | 1 |
Past 30 days - unrepresented claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Failure to amend | 22 |
Proof of service not filed | 4 |
3 tries and still noncompliant | 3 |
Request from claimant | 3 |
Bad-faith conduct | 1 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 1 |
1st year of CCB - all claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Failure to amend | 130 |
Proof of service not filed | 62 |
Respondent(s) opted out | 40 |
Request from claimant | 28 |
3 tries and still noncompliant | 13 |
Failure to provide respondent address | 8 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 5 |
Copyright registration refused by Copyright Office | 4 |
Foreign respondent; no bad faith found | 3 |
Settlement; dismissed without prejudice | 2 |
Service was not valid | 2 |
Bad-faith conduct | 1 |
Copyright registration application abandoned | 1 |
1st year of CCB - represented claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Proof of service not filed | 27 |
Respondent(s) opted out | 20 |
Failure to amend | 10 |
Request from claimant | 5 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 3 |
Settlement; dismissed without prejudice | 2 |
1st year of CCB - represented claimants
Reasons | Orders |
---|---|
Failure to amend | 120 |
Proof of service not filed | 35 |
Request from claimant | 23 |
Respondent(s) opted out | 20 |
3 tries and still noncompliant | 13 |
Failure to provide respondent address | 8 |
Copyright registration refused by Copyright Office | 4 |
Foreign respondent; no bad faith found | 3 |
Settlement; dismissed with prejudice | 2 |
Service was not valid | 2 |
Bad-faith conduct | 1 |
Copyright registration application abandoned | 1 |
Days elapsed betwen filing of initial claim filing of order dismissing claim
This data is only available for cases where the date of the filing of the claim is known.
All dismissals
Average: 117
Median: 99
Mode: [73, 87]
Dismissals in the past 30 days
Average: 126
Median: 88
Mode: [88]
Dismissals in the 1st year of the CCB
Average: 102
Median: 89
Mode: [73]
All Cases
Opening and resolution
Dockets found: 823
Claims dismissed/closed: 652
Status | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed Without Prejudice | 589 |
Dismissed With Prejudice | 34 |
Final Determination - Default | 12 |
Closed; looks like payment failed | 6 |
Final Determination | 5 |
Final Determination - Settlement | 5 |
Final Determination - Dismissal | 1 |
Final determinations issued: 23
Historical opening and closing numbers
Types of claims
The information about types of claims, representation, and whether a claimant has selcted the smaller claims track is pulled from the earliest publicly available claim filed in a case, and is only available when a claim is publicly available.
All claims
Claim type | Cases |
---|---|
Infringement | 653 |
DMCA Misrepresentation | 76 |
Infringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 55 |
Noninfringement | 12 |
Infringement, Noninfringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 9 |
Noninfringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 6 |
Past 30 days
Claim type | Cases |
---|---|
Infringement | 16 |
Infringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 2 |
DMCA Misrepresentation | 2 |
Noninfringement | 1 |
Noninfringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 1 |
1st year of CCB
Claim type | Cases |
---|---|
Infringement | 398 |
Infringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 35 |
DMCA Misrepresentation | 34 |
Noninfringement | 5 |
Infringement, Noninfringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 4 |
Noninfringement, DMCA Misrepresentation | 3 |
Smaller claims
"When total damages sought in a claim do not exceed $5,000 (exclusive of attorneys' fees and costs), a claimant may request consideration under the CCB's 'Smaller Claims' procedures. Smaller Claims will be decided by a single Copyright Claims Officer, but the determination will have the same effect as one issued by the full CCB. These types of cases are even more streamlined than the typical cases before the CCB."
Are claimants selecting the "smaller claim" option?
All claims
Smaller? | Cases |
---|---|
No | 464 |
Yes | 347 |
Past 30 days
Smaller? | Cases |
---|---|
Yes | 13 |
No | 9 |
1st year of CCB
Smaller? | Cases |
---|---|
No | 293 |
Yes | 186 |
Representation
Is there a law firm for the claimant listed in the claim?
All claims
25% of claims had claimants with representation.
0 claims had multiple law firms representing claimants.
(To save space, this table only includes law firms listed on two or more claims.)
Law firm | Cases |
---|---|
No law firm | 658 |
Jekielek & Janis | 47 |
The Law Office of David C. Deal, P.L.C. | 20 |
The Law Firm of Higbee and Associates | 14 |
H. Roske & Associates LLP | 12 |
Leichtman Law PLLC | 10 |
Higbee & Associates | 7 |
Doniger / Burroughs | 6 |
Burns the Attorney, Inc. | 6 |
Law Office of Eric Ridley | 4 |
Axenfeld Law Group, LLC | 3 |
The Brickell IP Group, PLLC | 3 |
Evans & Dixon | 3 |
Donahue Fitzgerald LLP | 3 |
Selman Munson and Lerner | 2 |
Howard O. Bernstein, P.C. | 2 |
McCulloch Kleinman Law | 2 |
UCI Intellectual Property, Arts, and Technology Clinic | 2 |
Seiller Waterman | 2 |
Past 30 days
36% of claims had claimants with representation.
0 claims had multiple law firms representing claimants.
Law firm | Cases |
---|---|
No law firm | 15 |
Jekielek & Janis | 3 |
Seiller Waterman | 1 |
Law Office of Elizabeth Swanson | 1 |
Faerman Law, P.A. | 1 |
CJN Law Group, P.C. | 1 |
UCI Intellectual Property, Arts, and Technology Clinic | 1 |
1st year of CCB
27% of claims had claimants with representation.
0 claims had multiple law firms representing claimants.
(To save space, this table only includes law firms listed on two or more claims.)
Law firm | Cases |
---|---|
No law firm | 376 |
Jekielek & Janis | 29 |
The Law Office of David C. Deal, P.L.C. | 20 |
The Law Firm of Higbee and Associates | 10 |
Leichtman Law PLLC | 7 |
Higbee & Associates | 7 |
Burns the Attorney, Inc. | 5 |
Law Office of Eric Ridley | 3 |
Axenfeld Law Group, LLC | 3 |
The Brickell IP Group, PLLC | 2 |
Donahue Fitzgerald LLP | 2 |
Howard O. Bernstein, P.C. | 2 |
Evans & Dixon | 2 |
McCulloch Kleinman Law | 2 |
Infringement Claims: Works Allegedly Infringed
In the database I created I have chosen to only include information on works from infringement claims. Some claims list multiple works. The data here describes all works listed in all infringement claims, not just, e.g., the first listed work.
Types of works
All claims
Type of work | Works |
---|---|
Pictorial Graphic and Sculptural (such as two-dimensional and three-dimensional works of art, graphic art, and photographs) | 578 |
Motion picture and audiovisual | 205 |
Sound recordings | 170 |
Literary (such as fiction, nonfiction, poetry, reference works) | 136 |
Musical (such as the underlying musical composition) | 75 |
Other | 52 |
Software | 16 |
Dramatic (such as a screenplay, play or other script) | 15 |
Architectural | 5 |
Past 30 days
Type of work | Works |
---|---|
Pictorial Graphic and Sculptural (such as two-dimensional and three-dimensional works of art, graphic art, and photographs) | 17 |
Motion picture and audiovisual | 16 |
Musical (such as the underlying musical composition) | 3 |
Literary (such as fiction, nonfiction, poetry, reference works) | 2 |
Sound recordings | 1 |
Dramatic (such as a screenplay, play or other script) | 1 |
1st year of CCB
Type of work | Works |
---|---|
Pictorial Graphic and Sculptural (such as two-dimensional and three-dimensional works of art, graphic art, and photographs) | 352 |
Sound recordings | 136 |
Motion picture and audiovisual | 129 |
Literary (such as fiction, nonfiction, poetry, reference works) | 67 |
Musical (such as the underlying musical composition) | 53 |
Other | 26 |
Dramatic (such as a screenplay, play or other script) | 9 |
Software | 7 |
Architectural | 4 |
Registration
For works allegedly infringed, did the claimant assert that the work was already registered at the time the claim was filed? Note that sometimes claimants assert this when it is not the case; I collected purported registration numbers and request numbers, but did not perform any checks or analysis on those numbers.
All claims
Registered? | Works |
---|---|
Yes | 889 |
No | 363 |
Past 30 days
Registered? | Works |
---|---|
No | 25 |
Yes | 15 |
1st year of CCB
Registered? | Works |
---|---|
Yes | 621 |
No | 162 |
Claimants
Claimants appearing on 3 or more claims
Claimants | Cases |
---|---|
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. | 47 |
Michelle Shocked | 15 |
Games Workshop Limited | 12 |
Amy Do | 10 |
World Media Alliance Label inc | 9 |
Julie Dermansky | 9 |
Jean M Guerrero | 8 |
Dana Hursey | 8 |
David Bibiyan | 8 |
Langston M Childs | 8 |
Pinwheel Crafts LLC | 6 |
Keith F. Bell | 6 |
Helen Walters | 5 |
William Grecia | 5 |
Floatsup, LLC | 5 |
Keith F Bell | 4 |
Nucleus Medical Media, Inc. | 4 |
VideoHat LLC | 4 |
Gergely Turi | 4 |
Hillary Wright | 4 |
Martin McNeil | 3 |
Jon Q Wright | 3 |
Florian Sommet | 3 |
Dolls Kill, Inc. | 3 |
Helen Walters, Ms | 3 |
Eckart Klobe | 3 |
Photolive Inc. dba Stockyard Photos | 3 |
Allen Nelson | 3 |
Gan Shu | 3 |
lead creation inc | 3 |
Shenzhiyishoumaoyishenzhenyouxiangongsi | 3 |
Terrell Lipscomb | 3 |
Catalina M Jaramillo | 3 |
Angela M Jarman | 3 |
Independent-International Pictures Corp. | 3 |
Nadine Hokayem | 3 |
Steven Hirsch | 3 |
Respondents
Respondents appearing on 3 or more claims
Respondents | Cases |
---|---|
Eamann M Ghasemy | 12 |
The Rochester Oratorio Society, Inc. | 8 |
YouTube, LLC | 8 |
YouTube | 8 |
Abdsulsalam Issa | 5 |
Google LLC | 5 |
Clayton Morris | 4 |
Townsville Realty LLC | 4 |
Alex Brecher | 3 |
YouTube LLC | 3 |
Apple Inc. | 3 |
Universal Music Group | 3 |
Respondents opting out of 2 or more claims
Respondents have opted out 70 times.
Download a CSV of all opt outs.
Respondents opting out | Cases |
---|---|
YouTube | 2 |
Bellisimo European Day Spa, LLC | 2 |
Orders to Amend
This data was collected by scraping all relevant headings from all publicly availble documents matching the type "Order to Amend Noncompliant Claim." The problems with claims can vary widely, and the attorneys writing the orders to amend aren't limited to a predefined set of headings. Because of that, similar reasons/headings appear in the table below, and the full tables would be very long, so I've trimmed them as indicated below. The full list of headings found, and counts for each, is provided at the end of the page for those who want to do their own analysis.
Note that many of the orders to amend include multiple reasons.
Top reasons - all orders
All orders to amend
1677 reasons collected from 660 orders in 512 cases.
Showing first 20 rows.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Substantial Similarity | 150 |
Access | 131 |
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 103 |
Copyright Registration | 72 |
Foreign Respondent | 59 |
Infringing Activity | 54 |
Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 43 |
Copyright Infringement — Substantial Similarity | 41 |
Copyright Infringement — Access | 40 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Registration | 38 |
Copyright Infringement — Infringing Activity | 33 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Elements | 30 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Substantial Similarity | 29 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Clarity | 23 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Access | 23 |
Allegedly Infringed Work | 23 |
Respondent Clarity | 22 |
Registration | 22 |
Relief Requested | 18 |
Registration Number | 18 |
Represented claimants
150 reasons collected from 87 orders in 67 cases.
Showing first 20 rows.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Access | 12 |
Substantial Similarity | 12 |
Foreign Respondent | 12 |
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 7 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Elements | 6 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Substantial Similarity | 5 |
Infringing Activity | 5 |
Misrepresentation — Elements | 5 |
Permissible Claim | 5 |
Copyright Registration | 4 |
Respondent Information | 3 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Clarity | 3 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Access | 3 |
Respondent Address | 3 |
Improper Form | 3 |
Claimant Address | 3 |
Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 2 |
Copyright Infringement — Access | 2 |
Copyright Infringement — Substantial Similarity | 2 |
Registration | 2 |
Unrepresented claimants
1527 reasons collected from 573 orders in 445 cases.
Showing first 20 rows.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Substantial Similarity | 138 |
Access | 119 |
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 96 |
Copyright Registration | 68 |
Infringing Activity | 49 |
Foreign Respondent | 47 |
Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 41 |
Copyright Infringement — Substantial Similarity | 39 |
Copyright Infringement — Access | 38 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Registration | 37 |
Copyright Infringement — Infringing Activity | 33 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Elements | 24 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Substantial Similarity | 24 |
Allegedly Infringed Work | 23 |
Respondent Clarity | 21 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Clarity | 20 |
Registration | 20 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Access | 20 |
Online Service Provider | 17 |
Registration Number | 17 |
Top reasons - past 30 days
All orders
68 reasons collected from 27 orders in 26 cases.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 6 |
Substantial Similarity | 6 |
Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 6 |
Access | 6 |
Copyright Registration | 5 |
Infringing Activity | 4 |
Registration | 3 |
Misrepresentation — Clarity | 3 |
Respondent Address | 2 |
Relief Requested | 1 |
Allegedly Infringed Work | 1 |
Copyright Registration — Other Works | 1 |
Access — Other Works | 1 |
Substantial Similarity — Other Works | 1 |
Works Infringed — Clarity | 1 |
Copyright Infringement — Co—Ownership | 1 |
Noninfringement Claim — Dispute | 1 |
Missing Allegations | 1 |
Unrelated Respondents | 1 |
Contact Information | 1 |
Noninfringement Claim — Clarity | 1 |
Infringed Work — Clarity | 1 |
Allegedly Infringed Work — Clarity | 1 |
Improper Relief | 1 |
Respondent Clarity Regarding Odysee | 1 |
Pending Litigation — Hard Lens Media, Inc. | 1 |
B. Scope | 1 |
A. Condition Precedent | 1 |
Impermissible Claim — Breach of Contract | 1 |
Online Service Provider | 1 |
Copyright Registrations | 1 |
Relief | 1 |
Misrepresentation | 1 |
Respondent Clarity | 1 |
Respondent Information | 1 |
Misrepresentation Claim — Clarity | 1 |
Represented claimants
10 reasons collected from 6 orders in 6 cases.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Copyright Registration | 2 |
Respondent Address | 2 |
Registration | 1 |
Impermissible Claim — Breach of Contract | 1 |
A. Condition Precedent | 1 |
B. Scope | 1 |
Noninfringement Claim — Dispute | 1 |
Infringed Work — Clarity | 1 |
Unrepresented claimants
58 reasons collected from 21 orders in 20 cases.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 6 |
Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 6 |
Substantial Similarity | 6 |
Access | 6 |
Infringing Activity | 4 |
Misrepresentation — Clarity | 3 |
Copyright Registration | 3 |
Registration | 2 |
Contact Information | 1 |
Noninfringement Claim — Clarity | 1 |
Copyright Registration — Other Works | 1 |
Missing Allegations | 1 |
Works Infringed — Clarity | 1 |
Copyright Infringement — Co—Ownership | 1 |
Relief Requested | 1 |
Substantial Similarity — Other Works | 1 |
Access — Other Works | 1 |
Unrelated Respondents | 1 |
Respondent Clarity Regarding Odysee | 1 |
Allegedly Infringed Work | 1 |
Improper Relief | 1 |
Pending Litigation — Hard Lens Media, Inc. | 1 |
Allegedly Infringed Work — Clarity | 1 |
Online Service Provider | 1 |
Copyright Registrations | 1 |
Relief | 1 |
Misrepresentation | 1 |
Respondent Clarity | 1 |
Respondent Information | 1 |
Misrepresentation Claim — Clarity | 1 |
Top reasons - first year of CCB operations
All orders
794 reasons collected from 323 orders in 265 cases.
Showing first 20 rows.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Copyright Infringement — Substantial Similarity | 41 |
Copyright Infringement — Access | 40 |
Access | 39 |
Substantial Similarity | 39 |
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 38 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Registration | 35 |
Foreign Respondent | 32 |
Copyright Infringement — Infringing Activity | 32 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Substantial Similarity | 28 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Clarity | 23 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Access | 22 |
Copyright Registration | 19 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 17 |
Infringing Activity | 16 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Elements | 16 |
Improper Pleading Form | 15 |
Permissible Claim | 13 |
Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 10 |
Registration Number | 9 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Online Service Provider | 9 |
Represented claimants
75 reasons collected from 43 orders in 38 cases.
Showing first 20 rows.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Access | 7 |
Substantial Similarity | 6 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Elements | 5 |
Permissible Claim | 5 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Substantial Similarity | 4 |
Claimant Address | 3 |
Improper Form | 3 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Clarity | 3 |
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 3 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Access | 3 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 2 |
Foreign Respondent | 2 |
Copyright Infringement — Access | 2 |
Copyright Infringement — Substantial Similarity | 2 |
Copyright Registration | 2 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Element of Access | 1 |
Legal and Beneficial Owner | 1 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Registration | 1 |
Respondent Address / Foreign Respondent | 1 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Impermissible Allegations | 1 |
Unrepresented claimants
719 reasons collected from 280 orders in 227 cases.
Showing first 20 rows.
Reason | Orders |
---|---|
Copyright Infringement — Substantial Similarity | 39 |
Copyright Infringement — Access | 38 |
Copyright Infringement — Elements | 35 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Registration | 34 |
Substantial Similarity | 33 |
Access | 32 |
Copyright Infringement — Infringing Activity | 32 |
Foreign Respondent | 30 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Substantial Similarity | 24 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Clarity | 20 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Access | 19 |
Copyright Registration | 17 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 15 |
Infringing Activity | 15 |
Improper Pleading Form | 14 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Elements | 11 |
Legal or Beneficial Ownership | 10 |
Copyright Infringement Claim — Online Service Provider | 9 |
Registration Number | 8 |
Impermissible Claims | 8 |
All reasons found
Download the CSV with counts for all reasons found across all orders to amend.